🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Politicians, campaigners, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Trend

Throughout Europe, a growing group of nations are moving toward parallel measures.

• The Danish government has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that smartphones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". A law may be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is set to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media account holders. Officials have stated that an Australia-style ban could be "one of the measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to pass a bill raising the legal age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to prevent their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without guardian approval is provided. Although it cautions of the "addictive" design of these apps, the move does not enact binding law.

"A clear age limit is a useful foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has kept open a possible ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any decision must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, momentum built behind a proposal to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government committed to further research the topic.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after being exposed to disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of risk when users turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the failure of the tech sector to build platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, regulation is mostly unfolding at the regional level amid country-wide stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits overnight use.
• Florida has enacted a measure prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted measures mandating adult authorization for minors to create social media profiles.

Despite cross-party agreement and calls from some politicians to mimic the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Apart from the West, further nations are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies take a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has warned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The organization notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

While this global debate evolves, the actions of the Australian government and others show that policymakers globally are no longer content to delay for tech companies to act voluntarily.